New York magazine quotes the Hong Kong newspaper Apply Daily, which alleges that propaganda officials were worried that 1) Avatar was stealing too many viewers from Chinese films and 2) the film, which describes the plight of the Na'avi, an intelligent people threatened with eviction by an evil military-industrial machine, was drawing too much attention to the sensitive issues of forced evictions in China.
Meanwhile, the China watching community has been abuzz about the subject in private emails, discussing the film's Chinese ramifications. Several scholars suggest that Beijing might actually see the film as a Chinese parable, about the Confucian-era struggle between the Legalists (read: the government), who believed in strengthening the power of the ruler, and Taoists (read: the innocent Chinese citizenry) who were more in tune with nature and less obsessed with calculations of profit and loss and big plans.
The Chinese leaders, Legalist by bent as they steamroll ahead with development at any cost, might not be so happy that the Taoists (read: the Na'avi) come off triumphant. Maybe. But it still seems more likely that the Chinese government just doesn't like the idea of an innocent people rising up against evil, rapacious government. There are many thousands of protests every year by Chinese property owners and residents who have been evicted by evil, greedy companies and corrupt local officials. At least China's film audiences now get to see the hunky Chow Yun Fat as Confucius.


I’ve been thinking a lot about the 

A New York City Chinatown Diary 





